Pros and Cons of Internal Recruitment
Countless
methods could be used for the purpose of recruitment (De Varo, 2020). It is
quite vital to ensure that the recruitment sources are chosen in a way which
achieves the organizational goals and objectives (Shafique, 2012). An organization should bear in mind
the company’s budget, skills, knowledge and abilities required to fulfill the
recruitment process (Compton, 2009). This
could be achieved by planning the recruitment needs vigilantly (Richardson,
2009).
One method used by companies to select the ideal candidate is internal recruitment. After the review of studies conducted by Muscalu (2015), Richardson (2009), Muscalu (2015) and Klementová, Hvolková and Klement (2016) the following pros and cons related to internal recruitment could be identified.
Pros/Benefits of Internal Recruitment
·
Low Cost
It will reduce the costs
such as costs involved in advertising and induction training as the candidate
recruited is within the organization.
·
Low risk involved
Internal hiring has low downside risk because the uncertainty about productivity is little, so Internal recruitment provides workers strong incentives because the pool of competitors is small which means that effort are more likely to be rewarded with promotion.
·
Continuous Encouragement/ Motivation
Internal recruitment motivates workers, who are planning to have a long term career in the organization to develop superior knowledge and skills.
·
Better knowledge about the candidate
Organization has a better knowledge about the candidate, his/her strengths and weaknesses and how responsive they are to the challenges given.
·
Workforce reallocation
A firm can reallocate its
workforce productively across job levels through
internal recruitment.
Cons/Disadvantages of Internal Recruitment
·
Inability to choose the “right candidate”
Sometimes it might be difficult to find the “right” candidate within the organization and the company might settle for an employee who does not possess the ideal mix of competencies.
·
Boredom
Working in the same company with the same people might make the employees bored as people prefer to have some sort of a variety even people wise.
·
Inability
to cater the vacancies due to an expansion
If the vacancies are arisen by continuous expansion of the organisation the supply of qualified individuals above the entry level may be insufficient which may result in people being promoted before they are actually ready to take up the position, or not being allowed to stay in a position long enough to learn how to do the job well.
·
Internal
politics
Due to favouritism and nepotism, some employees might not get the position even if they are the most ideal candidate for the job.
·
Interpersonal
conflicts
Fights within the colleagues, inbreeding, and varied perspectives shortages and interests may reduce the growth and the flexibility of the organization, and resistance to change by some employees who have an interest in maintaining the ‘status quo’ will lead to potential problems.
·
No
room for innovations and new ideas
As the same employees are being recruited, no
new knowledge or ideas will flow into the organization.
When
considering the reputed International School I work for, the school focuses
more on internal recruitment. Using this method has positively affected the
school because the teachers recruited internally knows the culture, tradition
and the behaviour of the students. There were some instances where the
externally recruited teachers could not cope up with the culture of an
international school. Moreover, the school also recognized the highly capable
teachers who can do their tasks well and provided promotions.
Even
though this method has been successful in the school, there are some downsides
to it. Favouritism and Nepotism could be highly witnessed. Teachers may
sometimes be given tasks which they actually cannot complete due to the high
workload they already have. This has led some teachers to give in their
resignation due to high job dissatisfaction.
List of References
Carroll, M., Marchington, M., Earnshaw, J. and Taylor, S., 1999.
Recruitment in small firms: Processes, methods and problems. Employee
relations.
Compton, R.L., 2009. Effective recruitment and selection
practices. CCH Australia Limited.
DeVaro, J., 2020. Internal hiring or external recruitment?. IZA
World of Labor.
Klementová, V.L.A.D.I.M.Í.R.A., Hvolková, L.E.N.K.K.A. and Klement,
L.A.D.I.S.L.A.V., 2016. Recruitment and employment of human resources in the
Slovak enterprises. Economic and legal issues and challenges of the
labour market and individual well-being, pp.1-13.
Muscalu, E., 2015. Sources of human resources recruitment
organization. Land Forces Academy Review, 20(3), p.351.
Pendola, A. and Fuller, E., 2021. Strength from Within? Internal
Recruitment and Principal Turnover. Journal of Education Human Resources, 39(1),
pp.18-53.
Richardson, M.A., 2009. Recruitment strategies. Managing/Effecting
the Recruitment Process. RTT.
Shafique, O., 2012. Recruitment in the 21st Century. Interdisciplinary
journal of contemporary research in business, 4(2), pp.887-901.
Hi Nimshi ,Selecting the right applicant can be a difficult task, but at the end of the day, the organization’s reputation is held by the people it employs (Henry & Temtime, 2009
ReplyDeleteI agree. Finding the ideal applicant for a position depends on a variety of internal and external to the organization considerations ( Zinyemba, 2014)
DeleteHi Nimashi, choosing the ideal candidate is not a easy task, however hiring someone internally is safer than hiring someone externally as the organization is full aware about the candidate and that's is the reason why most of the employer's likes to hire internally.
ReplyDeleteNot acceptable. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of both ways, a company can decide whether external method trumps the internal methods. Sometimes, external method would be the ideal solution.
DeleteInsiders are recommended because they know the company and its workplace structure, as well as having gained many skills that are unique to the organisation. Because the uniquely productive employment relationship benefits both parties, those skills tend to induce long-term employment interactions between employees and employers.(DeVaro, 2016)
ReplyDelete